Last night I read an NPR article “Trump Has Weaponized Masculinity as President” It brought up a lot of things that — as a single woman who’s been encoupled and married — I’ve thought myself.

What is this “masculinity” thing, anyway? The article gives a kind of explanation:

Trump’s overt hypermasculinity was a defining feature of his candidacy in 2016, whether he was talking about his testosterone count or his penis size or shrugging off the infamous Access Hollywood tape, in which he talked about committing sexual assault as “locker room talk.” That macho approach went on to define his presidency as well.

I remember Trump looming behind HRC in the debates and how that brought up a kind of PTSD I have from my relationships abusive men who acted the same way. It also made it easier to vote for HRC whom I really didn’t like, even though I thought she was by far the better candidate.

The model of masculinity embodied by Trump is not my model of masculinity. I guess the ideal man, in my mind, is a combination of my dad and my Uncle Hank. Someone smart, soft-spoken and competent, with a sense of humor, who likes women as people; who likes me. He’s not a bully and he’s not a lot of talk. He’s just good at what he does and takes pleasure in it. He’s open minded, curious and fair, able to admit when he’s made a mistake.

Trump’s relentless belittling of women infuriates me. I’ll say here that as a strong, intelligent, brave and formidable little female person life hasn’t been easy out there in the world of men. A really wonderful man I knew said once, “You’re an intelligent, sophisticated, physically attractive woman. Life in academia couldn’t have been easy for you.” That was like a voice yelling, “THIS!!” He was right. It’s OK. I did fine anyway.

Women have a (to me) inexplicable effect on some men. I can’t explain. I don’t get it, but it’s there. I hear it whenever Trump shuts down a female reporter.

… President Trump seems to have a gendered pattern to his put-downs: He tends to belittle male opponents as weak, saying they are “cryin'” or “little” or “low-energy,” whereas he often insults women’s looks or casts them as hysterical. Not only that, but he has a pattern of attacking women of color. (NPR)

When I see the opportunities open to women now vs. when I was starting out, I’m happy, proud, of the progress human beings have made. And, while Kamala Harris’ perspective is naturally turned toward race, I was moved when she answered the 60 Minute interviewer saying that being a candidate for VP:

“…helps change the perception of who can do what, because that is still part of the battle after all…”

Trump, of course, called Harris a “monster.”

The NPR article goes on to explain how the kind of masculinity Trump parades requires enemies and he’s managed to make enemies everywhere to fuel his image as the “tough guy who gets things done”. The price, according to the article, is “…a sense of a larger common good.” The result, the divisiveness in our country, and general political dysfunction here and in our international relations. No Macho Man can compromise.

One consolation is that this seems to have become his theme song. Listen to the words and imagine applying them to that massive excrescence that is 45. Ew. I doubt he even knows the history of this song, of this band, anything. At least he’s his own parody. You can see in this video where he learned his little “dance.”

26 thoughts on “Macho

  1. I’m thankful my masculinity has nothing to do with control or intimidation of women. At least, that’s my perception of it. It’s just not my way. When I see it in other men I usually decide it shows insecurity. I can be as macho as anyone, I guess, but it’s usually part of some physical competition and usually involves other men. If I bluster around women, it’s an attempt at comedy, poking fun at stereotypes. I hope that’s true, anyway. But there’s never an excuse to be an elbow (or other body part).

  2. As I said in a FB post replying to this very article, Drumpf is not embodying masculinity – he’s just a big old bully (and misogynist).

  3. Ya gotta be honest and truthful unlike top down but in ya my world Intelligence trumps Jajaja beauty age or sex! Company and understanding the way for real intimacy 😀🤣🙏🐕🐕♒️😷✅💯🎃👻🦷😱Jajaja

  4. He gives masculinity a bad name and provides a comfort zone for men who don’t know anything else but to belittle and disrespect women. As if women can’t also “get things done.” Perhaps also a comfort zone for some women (who support 45) who buy into that whole dynamic as well – feeling “protected” by “strong macho men.” Who don’t realize what they are sacrificing by doing so. I know of men who are like 45, but fortunately are not in positions of power (except in relationships).

    • It’s so weird to me that any women feel protected by “strong” men like 45 when he will demean them, hold them down, insult them and worse. I think you’re totally right; they don’t know what they’re sacrificing or they think that’s normal, how a relationship should be. I’ve been in my share of abusive relationships and none of those men — but one, were anything like 45 except they were scared, immature and/or narcissistic.

      I’m watching 9 to 5 which is really fun at this point in history especially seeing Lily Tomlin and Jane Fonda acting together so long ago. I remember my boss and his best pal at work really in a dither when the first ever “Take Your Secretary to Lunch” day came and they were afraid to take us out for fear they would be attracted to us or their wives would think they were cheating on them. 🙂

  5. Oh. oH. OH! I had no idea that his dance was a Village People imitation. I had to get a kleenex I was laughing so hard. But that doesn’t take away the reality of the situation and his disgusting behavior. I’m waiting now. The question is: Do I tune in and watch the election results into the night or go to bed and pray for good news in the morning??

Comments are closed.